This used to be called LinkedIn Pulse. Today it's articles, newsletters and regular feed posts, but the logic hasn't changed: you show expertise, and the right people come to you.
Option one: other people's content. See who leaves substantive comments on industry posts and articles: someone who wrote a detailed comment about pipeline problems is already a warm contact.
Option two: your own content. Real cases, breakdowns of mistakes and concrete numbers work. "We're the best on the market" posts don't. A format that reliably starts conversations: "A client raised lead-to-deal conversion from 8% to 17% in six weeks. Here are three things we changed in their pipeline."
The LinkedIn algorithm has changed significantly over the past year: the feed now runs on a new ranking model built on a large language model. What that means in practice:
- Reading time outweighs likes. Posts people read to the end get reach. Posts they scroll past don't.
- Comment depth matters. Thoughtful comments and author replies in the first 30–60 minutes boost distribution.
- External links cut reach. Independent studies put the loss somewhere between 20% and 60%, and moving the link to the first comment barely helps.
- Personal profiles beat company pages. Posts from people consistently get more engagement than corporate ones.
- Generic AI-written text gets suppressed in recommendations.
The takeaway for B2B: content should come from a specific person — the founder, the head of sales, a senior rep. Document carousels (a PDF in a post) walking through a case are one of the highest-engagement formats right now.
Content is slower than outreach, but its leads are warmer and cheaper: the prospect writes to you because they've already read three of your posts. More in our piece on
selling through social media.